I respectfully am inquiring of your view concerning (not)
using musical instruments during praise and worship service. Again, I am asking in total
respect and am not trying to "pick a fight". However, I do not agree with that
belief and would like to challenge it, so to speak. I have two (of many) points/questions
I would like you to address, (please):
#1) Numerous times in the Old Testament we are told to worship with singing AND
instrument. God never changes (Hebrews 13:8), so why would it be it be acceptable to God
then, but not now?
#2) I am assuming you will answer question 1 by somehow stating, again, that we don't see
God giving us that authority in the New Testament, but that is far from the truth. Now,
stay with me, here: Colossians 3:16 tells us to admonish one another in psalms. If you
look up the word "psalms" used in that verse, you may be surprised (The New
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance Of The Bible. Greek Dictionary Of The New Testament #5568)
That word in the Greek is "psalmos". It is defined as the following: "a set
piece of music, i.e. a sacred ode (accompanied with the voice, harp, or other instrument;
a `psalm')" If referring to the original language of the New Testament (Greek) isn't
good enough proof, allow me to share with you the word "psalm" in Webster's
Dictionary On-Line (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/mweb): "noun, Middle English, from Old
English psealm, from Late Latin psalmus, from Greek psalmos, literally, twanging of a
harp, from psallein to pluck, play a stringed instrument."
Please, address both concerns of mine. I have given this information to people before that
hold your same view. One of two things happen: 1) the person will not respond 2) the
person has no answers to my questions whatsoever. Nevertheless, the person holds fast to
that belief merely because it is what he/she has been taught - in spite of (what I
consider) me proving that view to be wrong.
Submitted by RMB on February 21, 1998
First, let me state that I commend you for your honesty in
asking a question. I wish that men and women everywhere would question things that are
taught and always strive to get to the truth that comes from God's word.
Before, I respond to your question, there is a little background information that will
prove essential. The Bible is divided into Testaments for a reason. A Christian is not
bound by anything under the Old Testament (the Law) as will now be shown.
In the book of Hebrews, Chapter 1, verses 1-2, the writer (probably Paul) states,
Heb 1:1-2 -- "(1) God, who at sundry times and in
divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, (2) Hath in these last
days spoken unto us by [his] Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also
he made the worlds" - KJV
The Hebrew writer spells out for us that there existed
different times and different manners in which God spoke to mankind. However, he does
indicate that we are living in the last days. It seems that the concept of the last days
has been confused in most peoples minds. Most people believe that the events described in
Matthew, Luke and Revelation pertaining to the "Last days" pertain only to the
very end of the Christian age. The book of Hebrews was written around 60-65 A.D. according
to most scholars. This means that it was written approximately 30 years after Christ died
on the cross. Since the writer identifies the days in which Hebrews was written as the
"Last days", it is obvious to the sincere Bible student that we too are living
in the last days. The term " . . . these last days" used in verse 2 of Hebrews
chapter 1 indicates that this is the final period in mankind's history. No other
time will occur prior to judgement.
The Hebrew writer also states that the Christian is now
guided by the words of Christ, the Son of God. This statement is also supported by Col
2:14,
Col 2:14 -- Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances
that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to
his cross; - KJV
Also,
Heb 8:13 By callings this covenant new [ the covenant is
the law of Christ -bjt], he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and
aging will soon disappear. - NIV
Close examination of these verses clearly illustrates that
the Christian is not under the Mosaic law. When the Israelites transgressed against any
one part of the law, they were guilty of the whole law. The could not keep just a portion
of the law. If a Christian was still bound to the law, we would have to keep the entire
law (sacrifices and all) in order not to transgress the law. However, Christ nailed that
to the cross (Col 2:14) and we are now subject to his commandments.
The above is provided as background information. It is
necessary to see that we are not under any part of the Mosaic law, but receive our
instruction from the words spoken by Christ in the New Testament.
Now to answers your 2 points.
[#1] - Numerous times in the Old Testament we are told to worship with singing
AND instrument. God never changes (heb 13:8), so why would it be it be acceptable to God
then, but not now? - RMB
My first question is this: Before David, did God ever require instruments in worship to
him? Did God ever require David to use instruments in worship? The answer to both
questions is no. There are several things that God commanded against, but David, as well
as other Old Testament characters, did contrary to God's will. Adultery and polygamy are
just two as examples. David not only committed adultery (punishable by death under the
law), but murdered the husband of the woman. He also had many wives (polygamy). These
things are contrary to God's will. However, God tolerated them.
In Amos, Chapter 6, starting in verse 1,
Amos 6: (1) Woe to them [that are] at ease in Zion, and
trust in the mountain of Samaria, [which are] named chief of the nations, to whom the
house of Israel came! (2) Pass ye unto Calneh, and see; and from thence go ye to Hamath
the great: then go down to Gath of the Philistines: [be they] better than these kingdoms?
or their border greater than your border? (3) Ye that put far away the evil day, and cause
the seat of violence to come near; (4) That lie upon beds of ivory, and stretch themselves
upon their couches, and eat the lambs out of the flock, and the calves out of the midst of
the stall;
And now notice verse 5,
(5) That chant to the sound of the viol, [and] invent to
themselves instruments of musick, like David; (6) That drink wine in bowls, and anoint
themselves with the chief ointments: but they are not grieved for the affliction of
Joseph. (7) Therefore now shall they go captive with the first that go captive, and the
banquet of them that stretched themselves shall be removed.
God himself says that those who, like David, invent for
themselves instruments of music, will go into captivity. God never wanted instrumental
music in the Old Testament. God has never wanted to be worshiped with the work of our
hands. For example,
Isa 2:8 Their land also is full of idols; they worship
the work of their own hands, that which their own fingers have made:
Jer 1:16 And I will utter my judgments against them touching all their wickedness, who
have forsaken me, and have burned incense unto other gods, and worshipped the works of
their own hands.
Jer 25:6 And go not after other gods to serve them, and to worship them, and provoke me
not to anger with the works of your hands; and I will do you no hurt.
Mic 5:13 Thy graven images also will I cut off, and thy standing images out of the midst
of thee; and thou shalt no more worship the work of thine hands.
These verses clearly illustrate that God considers worship
with the things made by men equivalent with idolatry.
Paul states in Acts 17:30, "And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but
now commandeth all men every where to repent". There were things that God chose
to overlook before, but now commands all men to repent, to follow God's way.
For these reasons, as well as the fact that we are not, as Christians, bound to the law,
the church cannot use the fact that David did it as authority to use instruments in
worship to God today.
[#2] (See top for description)
I commend your effort to use the original Greek to establish the meaning. I think that it
is great that the Bible was written in what is now a dead language. The nature and meaning
of that language does not change. In Col 3:16, "psalmos" is the correct Greek
word, and your rendering of the definition is likewise correct. But, taking the word
as it stands by itself outside of the text is not proof. We must look at the context of
the verse, and other verses on the same matter to correctly understand the writers
intention. But first, lets make sure we understand two points.
2 Timothy 3 - (16) All scripture [is] given by
inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness: (17) That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly
furnished unto all good works.
And,
2 Peter 1 - (21) For the prophecy came not in old time by
the will of man: but holy men of God spake [as they were] moved by the Holy Ghost.
Since the Bible is truth, it cannot contradict itself. Any
text that contradicts itself cannot be from God since,
I Corinthians 14:33 For God is not [the author] of
confusion . . .
And,
Titus 1:2 In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot
lie, promised before the world began;
Therefore, any text, document, manuscript or personal
knowledge that contradicts what the Bible says, is a lie, not truth, and is not from God.
With these ideas firmly in mind, that the Bible cannot contradict itself and that no
personal knowledge should ever contradict the bible, we must examine the following two
verses together.
Col 3:16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and
admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in
your hearts to the Lord.
Eph 5:19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and
making melody in your heart to the Lord;
In Colossians 3:16, the Greek text is "adontes en tais
kardiais umon to Theo" which is literally translated , "singing in the hearts of
you to God." The writer tells us to sing in our hearts to God.
If Ephesians the writer clearly states that we are to make melody in our heart while
Speaking psalms and hymns, not playing them on an instrument. These verses state clearly
that we are to make music in our hearts, not on instruments.
How does the bible tell us to sing? Are there specific reasons for singing?
The Bible Commands:
| Speak in Song (Eph 5:19) |
The Voice Can |
An Instrument Cannot |
| Teach (Col 3:16) |
The Voice Can |
An Instrument Cannot |
| Admonish (Col 3:16) |
The Voice Can |
An Instrument Cannot |
| Sing with Spirit (I Cor. 14:15) |
The Voice Can |
An Instrument Cannot |
| Sing with Understanding (I Cor. 14:15) |
The Voice Can |
An Instrument Cannot |
| Make melody in your heart (Eph 5:19) |
The Voice Can |
An Instrument Cannot |
In brief, the human voice is capable of doing everything
which God commands us to do as music in worship, whereas, the instrument is incapable of
doing anything required by Christian music except making melody. It however, does not do
this in the right place, the human heart. Remember from the previous answer, God does not
want to be worshiped with the things made by man's hand.
It is for these reasons that the church does not use instruments of music in worship to
God. They were never commanded and are forbidden by the above verses.
From a historical note, it was not until the Catholic Pope Vitalian first introduced the
organ into some services of the church in around 670 AD that instruments were used at all
in the any form of church. In fact, the scholars say otherwise.
Lyman Coleman (Presbyterian Scholar) wrote, "Both the Jew in their temple service and
the Greeks in their idol worship were accustomed to sing with the accompaniment of
instrumental music. The converts to Christianity must have been familiar with this mode of
singing, but it is generally admitted that the primitive Christians employed no
instrumental music in their religious worship."
Joseph Bingham (Church of England), in his book, "Antiquities of the Church",
says, "Music in the church is as ancient as the apostles; but instrumental music is
not."
The Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, in an article by J.M. Brown, page 852, adds,
"That instrumental music was not practiced by the primitive Christians. . .is evident
from church history."
John Calvin, the founder of a significant strain of the reformed churches in his
"Commentary on the Twenty-Third Psalm", said, "Musical Instruments in
celebrating the praises of God would be no more suitable than the burning of incense, the
lighting of lamps, and the restoration of other shadows of the law."
John Wesley, founder of Methodism, puts it this way, "I have no objection to the
organ in our chapel, provided it is neither seen nor heard."
Both the Bible and history state that musical instruments were never used in worship to
God. We must therefore conclude that instrumental music in worship is a product of man.
Therefore, anyone who sincerely desires to worship God in the same manner that he wanted
when he established the church in 33 AD on the day of Pentecost will seek to not use
instrumental music in worship.
I hope this answers your question. I hope that if you have any additional concerns about
material raised in this response, that you will ask me more questions. I will be glad to
study with you more. I find that the most common thing that people struggle with is how to
rectify the differences between the Old and New Testaments. I think it
would be good for us to study together the rightly divided word. If you are interested let
me know. I am always happy to study with a sincere, God seeking person.